I appreciate that.
I will tack on the second half of that question to my next question.
On inflammatory language and material, you spoke about this in your opening remarks with respect to emotions getting more engagement than facts. We've seen dog whistles, etc., by political parties generating a lot of engagement. That engagement does lead to ad revenue as well.
Is it fair to say that media platforms are actually benefiting financially when and if they allow this dissemination of misinformation and disinformation on their platforms?