Thanks, Chair.
That is what my understanding is. Based on the article, we're talking about 31,000 accounts reported between these years. I don't think what happened in between that is impacted by these timelines. We're not looking at accounts beyond what you're asking for in this motion. We're not looking at accounts, say, in 2024, where something may have happened. We're looking at the timeline of what was reported.
Is that correct?