I've written you some correspondence of late, on October 24 and before that on October 3, both dealing with Mark Carney, an adviser to the Prime Minister. I want to lay out a bit of why that correspondence was necessary. Then I have a couple of questions for you.
First of all, we have, in no particular order, the heat pump hustle by Mark Carney, also known as carbon tax Carney, where we learned that he was using his role as a special adviser to the government in the U.K. to lobby for his own interests. We've seen that this is a behaviour that he's comfortable undertaking.
Now, within days of being appointed to this panel of experts to advise the Prime Minister—we know that it's a panel of one, as he's the only one there—he landed billions in loans for his self-described friend who heads Telesat. This was announced as a way to connect Canadians, but we've learned recently that there are no requirements for a certain number of Canadians to be connected for those billions.
We know that he sits on the board at Stripe. The government was convinced to have credit card companies cap their fees, but Stripe, where he stands to benefit from his interests, isn't passing those savings on. They're benefiting from that as well.
We know that his investment firm holds the second-largest mortgage insurer in the country, which will directly benefit from the announcement that, again, came days after his appointment. These changes will allow for longer amortization periods, meaning that Canadians will pay more interest for longer, benefiting his interests again.
I've written you a couple of letters. Could you articulate what section 10.4 of the act allows you to do?