Thank you for that, Mr. Green.
This idea is that there's this piling up of different actions between committee testimony and reporting to the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner not just once, not twice, but three times. Not just once, not just twice, but three times, the commissioner came back with basically no findings that warrant further investigation. There is a privilege motion somewhere in the lineup. What could be delaying the House getting to that privilege motion? I don't know. Maybe somebody can help me out with that.
I think we voted on one subamendment. Who knows? I understand that every single member of Parliament on the Conservative side must speak to the.... Is it the subamendment now?