Okay.
I'll give you one other example in which their disclosure would be protected. I asked you earlier, and I'll let you close with the question that I asked you at the end, which was, to refresh your memory, this: What do you have to say to those people who might be feeling like they're being investigated now for being whistle-blowers to the media and, as you testified, could be facing termination?
I want to put to you that there is another example in which they could be protected, and that is in the instance of a public parliamentary hearing. In theory, I could invite, publicly, all the whistle-blowers to make anonymous submissions to this committee, which, in theory—based on my reading, although I'm not a lawyer and they would probably want to talk to the union—could protect them under the act.
Would you agree that's a possibility here, given the parliamentary privileges extended by Parliament?