I would put to you, in quasi-legal terms—my friend called it lying “by omission”—that it's a material non-disclosure. The public has a right to know when there are breaches, whether they're caused by private third parties like H&R Block or through an agency like the CRA. As we've heard, they have profound impacts on Canadians, people who were embroiled in potential fraud allegations and people who would no longer get access to their GIS or their OAS. It's a significant thing. I'm happy to hear you before committee, recommending that we provide that within your mandate.
You also mentioned your ordering powers. Can you expand on that a bit and on why it would be important to demand full disclosure and not have obstruction from, I would call them, belligerent departments?