Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I would also like to thank Mr. Dufresne and Ms. Gervais for being with us.
My colleagues have asked a lot of questions about how this works. They looked at the “how”. I would like to talk about the “why”.
At the outset, you mentioned that it was a matter of trust.
Philosophically speaking, trust means you don't need to prove something. However, in cases of invasion of privacy, you have to prove it every time. The obvious conclusion is that there is a lack of trust.
Is this the first incident at the CRA that you're aware of?