Thank you, Mr. Chair. I appreciate that.
It's really nice to have this meeting here today, although I had hoped that we would spend more time on issues that, quite frankly, have a greater impact on Canadians. I know that we had started the study on Uber and ride-share companies and their impact on the privacy of Canadians, on the use of surcharges and how those charges go through the hands of gig workers and the gig economy, and yet here we are, once again neglecting the real work that we should be doing and putting forward a whole bunch of very partisan mumbo-jumbo to debate here in this committee, knowing full well what the outcome is going to be.
I am quite disappointed, Chair, that we did not go down the path of actual work in ethics. Having said that, I think that I may be able to support this motion as I go through it, but I would make some substantial amendments to this motion as it is. If it is indeed just a production of documents, I don't see why we would delay it when Minister Sajjan has clearly said exactly what happened, but I do find that there are some mistakes, at least in the very ridiculous preamble of this motion.
As I review it, I'm sure that my colleagues would want to speak up. Perhaps in a little while, I can present an amendment based on what I think would take away the partisanship of this motion and actually accept documents that—
I'm sorry; what was that, Mr. Caputo?