That's an interesting question. It speaks to the role, among other things, of the OPC, not only as an investigative body but also as a body that can provide advice to companies or departments on how to comply with privacy laws.
That exercise involved, as you said, five data protection authorities across the world. The U.K. was one of them, as well as us. Because of COVID and the greater use of platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams and the like, these platforms were extremely helpful if not necessary for people to communicate and work, and so on. There were certainly issues, if not concerns, as to whether these platforms properly protected the personal information of users. Rather than formally investigate whether the platforms complied with the law, we had a more informal engagement with a number of these platforms where we were shown some of the technologies being used and how they were used, and we provided certain advice to improve privacy protection.
That exercise did not lead to a stamp of approval by data protection authorities. We looked at everything. We thought everything was compliant with the law, but we thought it was still useful to have this engagement with these companies to see whether anything clearly awry was happening, which we did not see, and to try to elevate the level of privacy protection in the use of these technologies.