I think we need to have ongoing exchanges with private industry, but also with citizens, interest groups, and the academic and parliamentary communities.
As for what is legal but unethical, this raises very important questions. If it is legal and unethical, should it continue to be legal? Shouldn't the legal regime be regulating that?
When I worked for the Canadian Human Rights Commission, I interacted with leaders who were acting in good faith and who absolutely wanted to do the right thing. However, they were faced with several legal obligations in this or that area. They had some flexibility, a framework. It was wishful thinking, but it was not legally binding. People set their priorities.
In my opinion, you have to put the incentives in the right place. If all we do is say that this is wishful thinking or an ideal, it is unrealistic to think that companies will necessarily give priority to this rather than to legal obligations that have deadlines and consequences.