I do. I think it's incumbent on public officials. Certainly, I would see that for agents of Parliament. I saw the commission as being important to express views to correct the record if misstatements are being made.
It's absolutely essential, of course, to be always fair with the facts. There is a lot of credibility that comes with such positions. I believe it should be used not only to make findings if there's a finding against the government, but if there's a finding to be made in favour of the government or industry, to highlight that something was done in the proper way and to show why. That is also part of generating trust to show that well.
This is consistent with the idea of having proactive audits, in that they can bring reassurance. The goal is not to go in there and necessarily blame or find fault, but to go in, work collaboratively and find solutions. If there is fault to find, if there is resistance and if that ultimate complaint is needed, so be it.
There's real opportunity, as well, to highlight when it is done properly. I think it is important for Canadians to hear that and to hear it from officials.