When you're talking about an intrusive technology like this, the onus is on the government to make its case for the use of the technology. One big problem—and I know the committee has heard this—is that currently adoption happens at the ground level, and any legislative response comes in response to that.
Some of our recommendations would flip that around by either creating a legislative obligation to go to the legislature and make the case for the use of some of these techniques in advance, or alternatively, by empowering the regulator, the independent Privacy Commissioner of Canada, to play a proactive role in assessing and approving or disapproving elements of these technologies. I think that might be one meta consideration for how to address some of these challenges more broadly.