It is exactly what Mr. Bezan said. Indeed, if we have them over two days, then I, as chair, would have the flexibility, if we can get all the witnesses and we need eight hours of meetings to accommodate all of them, to do it over two days. We could meet morning and afternoon over those two days, with the flexibility to have meetings that go longer than two hours. Many committees will meet for three.
I think you are correct in that Mr. Bezan's amendment would merely give flexibility to the chair over exactly how many hours would be required to do this study, but that it be limited to two days rather than two two-hour meetings.
Mr. Bezan, you're welcome to comment further if I didn't capture that accurately.
Otherwise, I see no other hands up.
If that is good for you, Iqra, and there are no other comments, we'll go to a vote on the subamendment.