Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Fergus, thank you for your apology. It isn't a problem.
I'm pleased that the clerk's team was able to translate the motion quickly.
As I said earlier, Ms. Khalid, I'm obviously not against obtaining the data, or protecting the public. I gather that the amendment is meant to clarify the motion, not to make a major change.
However, I see that the word “recommendation” is missing in the new version. It talks about reporting, but not about making recommendations. This is probably an oversight on the part of my honourable colleague.
I also want to make a distinction. Initially, we were talking about suspending the tender for obtaining the data. In this case, we're talking about a data tender. It's likely the same thing, but I would strongly suggest that we add the words “obtaining” and “recommendation”. I think that this will put us on the same page.
If those words can be included in the motion, I think that this will align with the spirit of the motion. We'll see. I'd certainly like some clarification with regard to “unduly affected”. In my view, this judgment is sometimes very personal. I'm sure that our honourable colleague can clarify the meaning of “unduly affected”.