I'll reference it for you, just the top sentence, which says, “When oral communications have been intercepted using an ODIT, the monitor who subsequently reviews the communication must cease reviewing the communication as soon as the monitor determines that no person in paragraph 3a is a party to the communication”. It sets a parameter.
The challenge that I have with the cavalier nature of law enforcement—you referenced stingray technology where they're mass intercepting communications from everybody and then deciding which ones they'll use—is who reviews their use? Once this warrant is granted and surveillance has begun, what mechanisms are in place to ensure that the RCMP are adhering to the terms of this warrant?