Well, I think what's important is that the tools are looked at in terms of their impact, their purpose and the importance of the public interest at play. It's not a zero-sum game, and it's that not you achieve the public interest by sacrificing privacy. You achieve both. However, there certainly is an argument to be made to have some requirements for authorization in the Criminal Code, approved by Parliament, that provide some specific conditions and information about the types of situations where it can be used.
These are all things we would be looking at to see if there's more we could recommend to make this stronger from a privacy standpoint. Maybe there will be; maybe there won't be, but the important thing is that this exercise takes place, because it could strengthen the program. Maybe we won't need to strengthen it because the program is already strong enough, but this will strengthen trust because it will reassure Canadians that there's been a vetting of this from a privacy standpoint.