Again, this kind of speaks to the reactionary way and the culture within the RCMP, quite frankly, that I've observed, after the fact.
With that being said, I still have a bit of a gap in what happens when the monitoring happens that might breach that fine line of here's our target, and our target is now around people not under investigation. Would that process also be open to a review basis? You know, with 32 occurrences that we know of going back to 2017, it feels like the Privacy Commissioner could have a meaningful role to play so that we at this committee don't have to embark on finding out after the fact in the media, quite frankly, which is a bit problematic.