Evidence of meeting #31 for Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was rcmp.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Commissioner Bryan Larkin  Deputy Commissioner, Specialized Policing Services, Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Commissioner Mark Flynn  Federal Policing, National Security and Protective Policing, Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Dave Cobey  Sergeant, Technical Case Management Program, Technical Investigation Services, Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Do you not agree that those agencies also have a duty of candour to the House of Commons and at committee?

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Without question, Mr. Green. I'm not—

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Okay, I want to reference for you, now that we have you here before us, the fact that in our previous studies, in fact, we had members of the RCMP refusing to even name what was already publicly available, the person who is responsible for procuring Clearview technology. We have a culture that has been reflected in the courts as being cavalier, which came through in a judicial decision commenting on both CSIS and the RCMP.

What are you doing as the minister responsible to ensure that the duty of candour results in our being presented with full, frank and completely transparent accounting at this committee and the House of Commons?

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

In short, I hold all branches within my portfolio accountable for those values you just stated, making sure that the mechanisms are designed and are delivering the transparency that is required to build trust and confidence. It is an ongoing exercise that constantly requires reflection, especially as we—

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Let me ask you this last question. We talked about the Privacy Act. We talked about having privacy rights embedded in the preamble. We have now determined that the preamble is actually not legally binding. Would you support putting privacy rights within the actual legal framework of the upcoming Privacy Act?

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Pat Kelly

Mr. Green has used all of his time without leaving time for an answer. Maybe he can answer—

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

I'll give him time to reflect on that and then reflect back in my next round.

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Pat Kelly

Minister, you can give us a quick yes or no to that if you'd like to. I'll let you. Otherwise, we're going to go to Mr. Williams.

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

You can go.

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

The short answer, Mr. Chair, is that there are charter and privacy protections already built in, but I invite future recommendations as this committee may submit.

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Pat Kelly

With that, I'll go to Mr. Williams.

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Williams Conservative Bay of Quinte, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Minister, thank you for being with us today.

This morning we had Canada's Privacy Commissioner in the room, who spoke about maintaining trust in our public institutions.

Do you believe in maintaining trust in our public institutions?

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Absolutely.

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Williams Conservative Bay of Quinte, ON

You stated in your opening statements that this technology that you know of has been implemented since 2017. Is that correct?

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

That's what I had been advised.

Ryan Williams Conservative Bay of Quinte, ON

Minister, is it acceptable to you that it's been five years that the RCMP has not submitted a privacy impact assessment and that they are just completing one now? The Privacy Commissioner thought that it would be provided at the end of August. Is it acceptable that it's been five years since they've had that completed?

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

As I have said previously, I think it is unfortunate that the Privacy Commissioner was just recently engaged, but I also want to clarify to you and to members of the committee that privacy protections are afforded and complied with in the context of the use of this technology when officers apply for judicial authorizations. That's one of the important—

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Williams Conservative Bay of Quinte, ON

Minister, my question was: Do you find it acceptable that it's been five years? Again, based on the fact that the commissioner this morning stated that he only learned of this in June—and we think June is probably too long—is five years too long?

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

I want to make it abundantly clear to you that when these techniques are used, including ODIT, there has to be a balancing—

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Williams Conservative Bay of Quinte, ON

Minister, yes or no is absolutely acceptable. Yes or no?

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

I've already said that there is privacy protection built into each and every instance when these techniques are used.

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Williams Conservative Bay of Quinte, ON

Sir, if you're not going to answer my questions, I don't know why we're asking them.

It's very simple. If we have a privacy commissioner asking for very basic instances from our institutions—and you've clearly stated that we want to have trust in our institutions—would it not be acceptable that we ensure, as much as we can in the government, that we have the very basics concluded by those institutions?

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

Of course. That's why I've said that—

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Williams Conservative Bay of Quinte, ON

Thank you, sir, very much.

Marco Mendicino Liberal Eglinton—Lawrence, ON

—we are engaged with the RCMP—I'm sorry, with the Privacy Commissioner.