It's a great question. Protecting innocent third persons' privacy and non-pertinent communications has been an issue ever since wiretapping began. If you look at the sample order that we provided, there are terms and conditions in there. Setting aside the ODIT for a moment, there are terms and conditions for regular wiretapping. Again, we'll go back to privileged communications. Privileged communications between a solicitor and their client have to be protected and treated in a very special way. The same applies to ODIT collections, and some of the terms and conditions in that sample order, which is representative of the orders that we seek, include the fact that non-pertinent information related to third parties and others has to be set aside, protected and only dealt with as guided by the court.
Another specific example, which is also included in that order, is the requirement that the hot mike feature described in the technical document can only be activated if there are grounds to believe that one of the principal known persons, as we call them, the—