We've had conversations from other members speculating on the role of preambles and making them into legislation. How important is it, do you think, to preserve the discretion of RCMP officers as they're conducting the work of security and protection of Canadians? Where's that balance of ensuring that privacy is protected with that oversight, which is very important?
Do you believe that creating rigid rules and regulations around that privacy, which, in these 32 cases that we're talking about, only intruded in the privacy of those who were being investigated for some very, very serious offences like terrorism, like murder, like trafficking...? Do you think that discretion should be allowed to the courts, to RCMP officers, in the role that they play? Where is that balance?