Thank you, Chair.
I would like to return to Mr. Therrien and some of the conversations that we were having in the previous hour.
There have been a lot of suggestions that judicial oversight isn't enough. I think what I heard from you is that it's pretty good protection and that it's not the only protection that we have to ensure that the RCMP fulfill their mandate to the letter of the law. For example, if they were to collect information through the use of this technology and take it to the court to use in prosecuting their suspects, and the court found that they didn't use it properly, then the evidence is no good and it's worthless to them, so it's no good for the RCMP to be using this technology outside the letter of the law.
I'm wondering if you agree with that and if you could expand on that a little bit.