That is an important distinction, because what's before us today isn't necessarily a positioning of the RCMP as being rogue or going outside the confines of the law, but it's the gaps, I would argue. In fact, Deputy Commissioner Larkin in his testimony suggested there were gaps in legislation.
Would you also then agree that even though what is currently legal, and I think we've established is quite outdated, it might not necessarily be ethical, given the way in which technology has outpaced legislation?