Let's talk about that oversight in the remaining time I have.
I'm comforted that the RCMP has said that they've only used this technology via judicial oversight, but of course, it would have been nice if they were more proactive in their disclosure of the use of this. We now have a pattern, I think, when we look at stingrays, Clearview AI and now this spyware technology, and again, we don't know who the vendor is.
Don't you think the Privacy Commissioner ought to be involved? When I look at the RCMP telling us nine out of 10 requests did not receive internal approval, I don't know what that internal approval framework is, quite frankly. I would think if I were responsible for the RCMP, I would proactively engage with the Privacy Commissioner in establishing that internal framework. Would that make sense to you?