Yesterday, there was a lot of talk about part VI of the Criminal Code. You know as well as I do that a situation may be lawful but unethical for many reasons. It seems to me it's not enough to address part VI. We have to be able to examine the situation impartially. The impression I got yesterday was that I was being forced to believe the RCMP. We had to believe it.
Do we have to maintain that position, that we must believe the RCMP? If that's the case, does that preserve or increase public trust?