Well, I like very much, as I mentioned, the necessity to exercise control, accountability and transparency as much as possible. They are a cornerstone of our democracy. At the same time, we have a responsibility to work against and protect Canadians against some very serious threats that do not have any concerns about the philosophical debate of what is right and what is not right. They do it, period.
I'm absolutely and totally in favour of this capability to find the right balance, to question ourselves and to work constructively in allowing officers to be capable of performing their duties, while at the same time making sure, just as I said, that the end cannot justify the means. We have to be capable of striking that balance in order to be capable.
That also returns to the responsibilities of elected officials. Police are at the tail end of a problem. We're trying to resolve something when we are facing the problem. Sometimes the problem, like terrorism, emerges from the lack of actions taken by politicians earlier when the grievance was brought to their attention. It's not necessarily that you believe or you accept the grievance, but you must be capable of taking action. This is what the work of this committee is so important for.