My answer to you for that question, which I've published in my Macdonald-Laurier Institute article, is that the OIC, first and foremost, would be given a one-year limit to decide on the given complaint—one year. If within one year they haven't decided or they haven't completed it, then the user has the right to go to court. Then you have a real outline to provide you with the capacity to have your right respected, so go to court.
As I said, in the States there's no information commissioner. You put in a complaint to the agency where you first requested records, and if they don't respond to your request, then you go to court. In Canada, you have to line up and wait until the Information Commissioner provides you with a report of their findings. That could be six or seven or eight years, so hold the Information Commissioner to produce a report within one year. Surely they can do that, and they should. Then if they don't provide you the records that you're after, you have the ability to go to court in order to ensure that your quasi-constitutional right is respected.