My understanding is that discussions with the company indicate that what they do is not even germane to what the committee was studying. They don't do facial recognition. To me, tabling the trip with no purpose really doesn't make any sense. If the report's already been tabled in the House and this company doesn't do facial recognition, there really is no reason for us to plan it or have it on the books or table it in that regard.
My preference would be to get rid of it. That way, it's clear to the clerks and the analysts that there is no plan for this committee to travel.