Thanks, Chair.
Just taking into account what members have said and based on discussions that I've had with members on this specific motion—I know I've had these conversations with all opposition members—I propose that we start this study.... Mr. Bains also pointed out that at OGGO, it was a unanimous motion voted on by all parties to have this study. I would propose to members that we go ahead and start what Mr. Barrett is proposing after we receive all of the testimony and evidence at OGGO. That will allow us to fill in the gaps, which I think is the ultimate purpose of what Mr. Barrett is trying to achieve with that privacy angle here at ethics.
Chair, with your approval, I would move an amendment to this motion: In the third line, where it starts with “That this study begin”, delete the word “immediately” and replace it with “upon completion of all witness testimony and submissions from the study at OGGO”, and then continue with “and that the committee report its findings and recommendations to the House.”
It would read, “That this study begin upon completion of all witness testimony and submissions from the study at OGGO”.
This is similar to what we're proposing to study here.