Thanks for that.
I'll turn to Mr. LaPointe. I really want to understand this a little bit better from a person who's had vast experience in the media.
With the changing role of media and what journalism looks like in today's day and age with blogs and so much information out there, does ATI hinder true journalism or is it a proponent of true journalism? Where do subjectivity or vexatious or frivolous claims fall within that whole category?
You mentioned subjectivity and interpretation of documents. I'm sure you've sometimes received thousands of documents on an issue and you could shape a story whichever way you'd like it to be shaped based on what's in the documents and what's not in the documents you've received.
I'd love you to unpack that a little bit. My apologies for that really loaded question, but I would appreciate anything you can provide as insight.