Okay, understood.
In addition to the need for more resources, there is one question that always comes to mind.
I'm thinking of what happened during the summer. I don't know whether you were monitoring the glyphosate incident, in which the GMO watch group called Vigilance OGM, in response to an access to information request made a year earlier, received 200 blank pages that had been completely redacted.
That leads me to wonder who, under the current act, is accountable. There is an overriding principle in politics, and that is accountability. People are accountable for what they do.
From the standpoint of information, how can decision-makers be kept under control? Are decisions made only by public servants? At the end of the line, shouldn't ministers be held accountable for information that is disseminated and information for which dissemination is denied?