To your first point, I would say that I feel the ATIP study is best scheduled in a lexical order that helps us provide the most important primary testimony first. I find that it's helpful in studies, particularly of this nature, to be informed by subject matter expertise, government staff, ministers and that type of thing up front, and to then get into other, more ancillary witnesses.
I'm not sure that was the case—and I say that respectfully—in terms of today's intervention, so I would say that we do put it on pause until the new year and then allow the clerk and you, sir, to work out a work plan that has, to the best of our ability, a lexical order of operation.
As it relates to the commissioners, I'm certainly fine to have them all in one meeting, but I would leave that up to the discussion of the other committee members around the table.