Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'm trying to figure out—I'm not decided yet—whether or not the filibuster is going to be worse than whatever other amendment the government side has coming next.
Look, I think this is a redundant motion. I think that within our committee processes we have the full ability to call for whatever witnesses we want. Surely, our analysts would include the work of previous committees. We'll see. We'll see how many other amendments they have to offer.
I don't think this is necessary in any stretch of the imagination. I'm starting to wonder. I should have known when there was a unanimous vote to actually continue this debate that something was coming our way. Here we are.
I look forward to hopefully getting this motion passed. Again, when we come back to picking the witnesses, then absolutely, move a motion to call Pierre Poilievre and Tim Uppal to have them testify. I mean, knock yourselves out.
Right now, I feel like we're just going to see a series of more amendments that might take us off the main motion, which is really what I'm looking for.