I'm going to deal with some of the questions Ms. Khalid asked.
This is where we stand right now: We have the ATIP study, and we have the Treasury Board report submitted to Parliament. There's lots of interest in that. We have the Lobbyists' Code of Conduct. The commissioner is coming Friday, and there's lots of interest in that. Then, of course, there's the China interference. That is what I'm trying to juggle. I'm seeking the committee's consensus on where we want to go after next week, and what the priority is.
I've spoken with Mr. Villemure, and I know he would like to start the foreign interference study as quickly as possible.
However, I will ask you this, Madam Clerk: In the motion on the foreign interference study, if I recall, the word “immediate” was in there, or something to that effect. Is that correct?