If I understand correctly, you have received legal advice referencing a potential Charter violation relating to the right to political activity.
I wonder though if that should not instead have been analyzed in terms of the right to work.
Political activity comes first. The inability to perform part of one's work comes next. This raises a few questions. I do not think it is people's political activity that is being limited, but rather their right to work, just as a former MP is prevented from being a lobbyist for five years.
I would like to hear your thoughts on that.