Certainly it speaks to one of the issues of Canadians simply wanting to be able to trust that their officials have not had undue influence exerted and whatnot.
One of the challenges.... I know you spent a lot of time moving the code to plain language so that it's more clearly understood and helping to find that right balance. You outlined in your report how you heard examples from both sides.
Can you explain to the committee how this would help build public confidence in the system to ensure that Canadians know their officials are not under undue influence?