My opinion would be that she should comply with the Ethics Commissioner fully, which she did, and that she should acknowledge the findings of the Ethics Commissioner, because the Ethics Commissioner took a thoughtful time over a matter of months to look into this situation.
The Ethics Commissioner found that there wasn't any fault with the work and there wasn't any fault with the need for the work or the contract itself, but that it was a matter of recusal. I think that my advice would be to the minister to acknowledge that, to acknowledge that there is an issue here.
The member I just spoke with spoke about remedies that could be put in place. I think that's a valuable outcome of a meeting like this, so I would encourage both additional training for staff and also to be an advocate for some of those remedies that could be put in place to make sure that something like this, from a recusal standpoint, doesn't happen again.