He did not in this instance, no. I would put to you that it's not good enough to keep having to come back to this committee with these scandals when there aren't really clear consequences in place, because obviously when the minister is left to her own devices, an apology and a commitment to working harder do not resonate with Canadians who are struggling to get by.
Do you have any reflections at all—and I'm not even talking about your friend Mary—moving forward, about how providing clear consequences, having clearer definitions within the act and having greater checks and balances in place may prevent somebody like you from having to spend their time in front of a committee like this?