Ma'am, I was very specific in my question that the person who was found to have broken the Conflict of Interest Act is a minister of the Crown. She's a designated public office holder.
My question is specifically with respect to the law having been broken, the perceived need for consequences by Canadians and the effect that this has on their confidence in public institutions. My question was specifically that if you don't believe the minister should make restitution to Canadians, why do you not believe that?
It is the conduct of the minister that I'm speaking to. I appreciate the context that you're providing as the vendor, but my question is very specifically about the need for the minister to provide restitution and, frankly, because of its negative effect on Canadians' confidence in ministers of the Crown, this has precipitated our call for her resignation. That was the nature of my question.