Yes, I think you're absolutely right. We agree that getting big money out of politics makes a lot of sense. That's why it's individually funded. That subsidy would help to do that.
What that subsidy would not do is negate the need for volunteers. Elections would still need volunteers. They would still need people to take the phones, knock on doors, etc. That means these rules would still have a negative effect on people like me and other leaders in the labour movement from having to choose between whether we want to be representing our members or be volunteers in elections.