Sure. That's a great question.
I think we're solely focused on China because it is, as I've said, the A-team when it comes to foreign interference. There is absolutely no comparison in terms of scope and qualitative differences.
One of my colleagues alluded to Iran. We've seen a shift in Iranian interference, such that they're now contracting out in the private sector. This is in the media in Canada, the U.S. and Britain. They're using private investigators to follow people. There are some shifts in how they do this, which is related to harassing and doing worse with dissidents.
Russia has always been a player, but Russia is very strong on its intel and intelligence services. It's somewhat different from China in the way it does things.
One country I'll say is India. India does foreign interference in Canada. We've seen this, and we've seen it in the media.
There are a number of foreign states. As one of my colleagues says, they're not necessarily all hostile to Canadian interests. Some of them are neutral, I guess you can say. Some of them could be allies.
It's hit-and-miss in some areas. I don't want to go back to belabouring the PRC, although that is the reason we're here. They just do it extremely well. They really do. It's a whole-of-government, whole-of-society approach. You know about the national security law that was passed in 2017, whereby anyone with Chinese status anywhere in the world has to co-operate.
There are other players. They're just not at the same depth.