We have a National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians here. It's made up of parliamentarians whose backgrounds are carefully checked and who commit to reviewing any type of top-secret document. However, limits have been placed on what they can reveal about those documents afterwards; they produce a highly classified report and another one that is made public.
Do you feel this is a good way to go about it? Is it similar to your way, where you can review some documents you're free to disclose and others you cannot?