Mr. Rosenberg, the instruction given in your report is remarkable. I have nothing to say about that.
However, what intrigues me are the four lines on page 46 that say we cannot conclude that there was interference. That is what is said in those four lines. However, our Prime Minister says the report concludes that there was no interference.
That seems to me to be a greatly exaggerated interpretation of your report. Regarding the protocol, the application and the evaluation, your report is exceptional. But it was not a report about interference.