I'm not going to repeat the same comments. Dr. Parsons really has the best ideas on the actual changes that are required. However, I also agree that we need to do something far broader.
I would like to recommend that we spend more time considering how these things are done in other countries. As I mentioned in my comments, in the European Union there isn't a question about whether this is or isn't surveillance. You start with the notion of surveillance, which is very broad. Then you recognize that there are different aspects to it and different kinds of harms that could result and different kinds of social benefits that could result.
I think looking at how other countries operate would be very helpful, specifically the European Union. More than one of us has mentioned the importance of looking at what is happening there, because the way in which the law is being reinterpreted for the present data-focused age is really highly significant.