I'd like to go back to something. Everything is based on the jobs that public office holders have after they leave office. They might, for example, be paid to provide advice. Let's say that the act is tightened up and henceforth requires total transparency. Former designated public office holders could say that they gave their advice free of charge to the organization and were not paid, but then receive a cheque 10 or 15 years later if a contract is awarded. So throughout this entire period, they could be giving advice free of charge, because they are independently wealthy. Once again, they are circumventing the act.
So, what's to be done?