Well, we'd be pleased to put questions to the Prime Minister if he'd come to committee, but we can't even get any of his caucus to be here.
How do you think that in relation to this type of trip, where we have $160,000 that taxpayers are on the hook for and we have this relationship of the Prime Minister's foundation with a donor giving a trip to the Prime Minister...? It has shades of “The Trudeau Report”, the first one, where your predecessor ruled on the Prime Minister's illegal vacation to Bells Cay. He was in violation of the act.
How can the act and the code be strengthened to prevent this type of ambiguity and these contraventions of the law that we've seen detailed in “The Trudeau Report”?