Yes. I'm happy to speak to that one.
Our general practice is to aggregate either by time or by a geographic boundary defined by population for all analyses we supply to the agency.
In the case of a rural setting, the smallest geographic boundary would be defined by the underlying population as calculated by Statistics Canada. That would be a relatively large spatial area. However, we would still, in that situation, only report statistical summaries, numbers of devices, proportions and percentages. There would be nothing conceivably identifiable or associated with an individual device, or anything like that.
I would reassure a rural constituent that there's no prospect of identification, even in that setting.