I think it was actually quite helpful. As I was describing earlier, the counterfactual, or how this would have played out in the absence of these types of data, would have been trying to catch up after we saw that cases were surging in a particular area. This is a leading indicator by being a proxy of contacts that are forthcoming.
I will say that in our anecdotal assessments of the past two years, we've seen many instances of the analytics that we have generated and provided to the Public Health Agency being precursors of subsequent surges or providing really important actionable insights.
What I think, and I say this as a scientist, is that to answer that question appropriately and fully would require a full retrospective after the pandemic is over to understand what worked and what didn't. Just as in any other instance, there's an opportunity to learn from this.
The simple answer is that I think a lot of lives were positively impacted and benefited from this type of work. This is notwithstanding the importance of privacy, which we're discussing here today, but I do firmly believe it had a very strong impact on protecting lives and livelihoods across the country.