Yes, definitely. Ultimately, without access to information, without knowing our rights, without knowing what's going on in government, we can't understand what's going on at that level, make democratic decisions or vote.
Based on the Supreme Court's interpretation, it's all part of and flows from the right to freedom of expression. That's why we're saying that it's quasi-constitutional. I feel that's misunderstood. However, more and more, Canadians are realizing that information is crucial to their choices or the way they live their lives. Therefore, we could certainly go so far as to ask that it be considered a constitutional right that must be protected.