So we're bleeding between consent and transparency here. I'm trying to understand where we could improve the government's transparency to the public on what we were doing. You're bleeding into the issue of consent on the actual interaction on the data.
That leads to my next question. We did have Telus for Good here, and Pamela Snively from their office went through a really detailed explanation of how their data platform is used not only by PHAC, in a very controlled setting with supervision, but also by universities like the one you are a part of and many other research institutions across the country, and how Dr. Ann Cavoukian in “Privacy by Design” actually extolled and praised Telus for Good in terms of the de-identified data that was used and the privacy standards they use.
In your opening comments, you stated that the pursuit of the perfect should not prevent the good. Now I can get back to what you were talking about. I really wanted to separate it out. What further steps do you feel the government could have taken to be transparent on the data?