Thank you. That's a yes.
I want to offer you a quote. You said, “Like, you don't want a David Johnston special rapporteur or something, where people are like, 'Oh, it's another member of the Liberal elite who is sweeping this under the rug.'”
You also said, “So we're thinking of setting up an office that would be like a new deputy minister, like reporting to the deputy or report to me. We'll see. It depends, I guess, on how the minister wants to run things.”
This is the story: In May, when ISED got the report findings you were gung ho. You were ready to fire the board. You were ready to fire everybody and then open a new office with a director general and a team, and have a spokesperson. You just didn't want it to be someone who is the Prime Minister's neighbour or member of the Trudeau Foundation. You even called it a sponsorship-level giveaway.
Then, in June, after the minister was briefed, the direction and attitude completely changed. You said, “We'll be just amending our current contract to continue the scope of study.”
What a climb-down. I find this incredible, sir.
What did the minister say in June to halt the plan that you laid out?